Perspectives on Integrative Medicine

Protocol

A Study Protocol for Developing a Consensus-Based Reporting Guideline for Case Reports on Acupuncture-Related Adverse Events: Tae-Hun Kim, Ye-Seul Lee, Jung-Won Kang, Myeong Soo Lee, Lin Ang, Jeremy Y. Ng, Stephen Birch, Terje Alræk, Lin Yu, Yuting Duan, Zhirui Xu; Perspect Integr Med. 2025;4(2):117-120. Published online June 23, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.56986/pim.2025.06.007

2,081 View
33 Download
1 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Case reports play a crucial role in identifying safety concerns related to new or rare complications and adverse events (AEs) associated with therapeutic interventions. Although acupuncture is generally considered safe when performed by trained professionals, the increasing number of case reports reporting acupuncture-related AEs has raised public safety concerns. A recent systematic review of case reports from 2010 to 2023 determined that many reports lacked the essential details necessary for assessing AE causality, treatment appropriateness, and contributing risk factors. These omissions may result in misinformation, and exaggerate the potential harm of acupuncture. The CAse REport guidelines (13 items) provide general guidance to improve the clarity, completeness, and transparency of case report findings, but they do not address the unique clinical features and factors specific to acupuncture-related AEs such as defective needles, practitioner malpractice, or patient-related factors. These limitations may hinder the educational value of such reports in preventing acupuncture-related AEs. To address this gap, a consensus-based reporting guideline tailored to acupuncture-related AEs is necessary to enhance the quality, transparency, and reliability of case reports, which will ultimately contribute to improved patient care. This article outlines a protocol, and approaches, for developing a reporting guideline for acupuncture-related AEs in case reports.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

REporting Guidelines for aCupuncture‐Related AdverSe Event Case Reports (RECASE): Elaboration and Explanation
Ye‐Seul Lee, Tae‐Hun Kim, Jung‐Won Kang, Lin Ang, Jeremy Y. Ng, Stephen Birch, Terje Alræk, Lin Yu, Yuting Duan, Zhirui Xu, Myeong Soo Lee
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Original Article

A Survey of the Clinical Practice of Korean Medicine for Smoking Cessation in Public Health Centers: A Web-Based Survey of Public Health Doctors of Korean Medicine: Gyoungeun Park, Jeong-Hyun Moon, Eun-Jung Kim, Byung-Kwan Seo, Yong-Hyeon Baek, Won-Suk Sung; Perspect Integr Med. 2024;3(1):45-50. Published online February 22, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.56986/pim.2024.02.006

3,325 View
25 Download

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Background
In South Korea, public health centers provide smoking cessation (SC) treatments including behavioral therapy and nicotine replacement treatment. Also, public health doctors of Korean medicine (PHDKMs) are providing Korean Medicine (KM) treatments. Several studies have reported the clinical usefulness of KM treatment, but in this study, the opinion of PHDKMs was explored to examine the current KM treatments for SC.
Methods
A web-based survey (Moaform) of the treatment for SC by PHDKMs consisted of 5 main sections including clinical practice status, SC participants, KM treatments for SC, progress and prognosis, and perception of KM. The survey was emailed twice to 621 PHDKMs on April 6 to 20, 2022. The frequencies and percentages of each question were calculated.
Results
There were 28 PHDKMs who participated in the survey. Among them, over 90% of PHDKMs had treated ≤ 10 SC participants, and about 10% of PHDKMs had treated 11-20 participants. The abstinence rate was 56.8% with an average 63.2% level of satisfaction in the treatment. Typically used, and recognized as important KM treatments, were auricular acupuncture, acupuncture, education, and herbal medicine. While auricular acupuncture and education were perceived as convenient KM treatment, PHDKMs thought that SC could not be achieved with KM treatment alone and needed be combined with other treatments.
Conclusion
This survey showed the effectiveness of KM treatments with withdrawal symptoms, and treatment satisfaction of SC participants. Respondents also thought that KM treatment combined with other treatments is more effective than KM monotherapy. Based on this small study, further research would be needed.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search