1Department of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, Bucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Buchoen, Republic of Korea
2Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea
©2023 Jaseng Medical Foundation
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: IHH. Methodology: YJL. Formal analysis: DK. Investigation: DK. Writing original draft: DK. Writing - review and editing: IHH and YJL.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethics Statement
This research did not involve any human or animal experiments.
Funding
None
Data Availability
All relevant data are included in this manuscript.
Type | 1st author (y) [ref] | Country of origin | Study design | Participants’ condition, number of participants (intervention/control) | Type of intervention | Comparator | Outcome | Main results | Adverse events |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Noh (2021) [50] | Korea | Pros, Obs | LBP or radiating pain, 40 (20/20) | IKM/MSAT | IKM | NRS, ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L |
Diff between two groups after tx NRS for LBP: −1.2 (−2.22, −0.19), p < 0.05 NRS for RP: −0.97 (−1.89, −0.06) p < 0.05 |
Tx (n = 4), ctrl (n = 8) Severity: mild Sx: gi sx (heartburn, abdominal discomfort) |
Kim (2020) [24] | Korea | RCT | Neck pain, 100 (50/50) | IKM/MSAT | IKM | NRS, VAS, NDI, ROM, EQ-5D-5L, PGIC |
Diff between two groups after tx NRS: −1.05 (−1.57, −0.53), p < 0.05 ROM (Flexion): 5.55 (2.80, 8.31), p < 0.05 ROM (Extension): 6.60 (2.97, 10.23), p < 0.05 |
Tx (n = 13), ctrl (n = 7) Severity: mild except 1 Sx: diarrhea (n = 12), nausea or heartburn (n = 3), itching and rash (n = 4), dizziness (n = 1). | |
Wang (2020) [49] | China | RCT | Post-stoke, 105 (35/35/35) | C_rehb/Acu + KT | C_rehb/1. Acu only 2. KT only | MAS, ROM FMA, BI |
Diff before and after tx in the tx group MAS: 1.41 ± 0.49 (ctrl 0.82 ± 0.43, 0.74 ± 0.28) FMA: 9.91 ± 3.01 (ctrl 6.45 ± 1.91, 5.85 ± 1.79) ADL: 28.24 ± 5.59 (ctrl 19.70 ± 7.60, 19.85 ± 6.80) |
Not specified | |
Wang (2015) [30] | China | Case series | TMD, 15 | Floating acu + jaw movement | None | - |
Recovery: 10, Significant effect: 2 Effect: 2, Invalid: 1 |
Not specified | |
Shi (2015) [31] | China | Case series | Post-stoke, 30 | Exercise acu | None | - |
Recovery: 5, Significant effect: 9 Effect: 12, Invalid: 4, Effective rate: 86.7% |
Not specified | |
2 | Shi (2018) [32] | China | RCT | Shoulder pain, 164 (41/41/41/41) | Acu/MSAT | 1. MSAT + mCAT 2. mMSAT + CAT 3. mMSAT + mCAT | VAS, CMS, SF-36, Treatment Credibility Scale |
VAS at the 18-wk follow-up: MSAT 25.3 (24.1)/mMSAT 35.0 (25.0), p = 0.013 CAT 29.6 (25.2)/mCAT 30.7 (24.7), p = 0.78 CMS at the 18-wk follow-up: MSAT 79.9 (15.5)/mMSAT 73.3 (16.7), p = 0.010 CAT 75.3 (17.5)/mCAT 78.0 (15.1), p = 0.29 |
Tx (n = 6), ctrl (n = 6) Sx: small hematoma (n = 6), discomfort at needle insertion (n = 4), needling pain (n = 2) |
Lyu (2022) [36] | China | RCT | Neck pain, 76 (39/39) | Acu/MSAT | Acu | SF-36, pain pressure threshold | MSAT can be effective when the physical function score is 41.7–68.7 in the tx group, and CAT can be effective when the general health score is 56.09–66.09 in the ctrl group | Not specified | |
Park (2022) [27] | Korea | Retro | LBP or radiating pain, 152 (28/124) | IKM/MSAT (H-MSAT or T-MSAT) | IKM | NRS for LBP NRS for RP, ODI, EQ-5D-5L |
Outcome changes in the MSAT group after tx NRS for LBP: 5.71 ± 1.58 → 2.57 (1.96–3.19) NRS for RP: 6.14 ± 1.35 → 2.72 (2.02–3.42) ODI: 49.69 ± 18.16 → 27.46 (22.26–32.66) EQ-5D: 0.54 ± 0.20 → 0.75 (0.71–0.80) |
Not specified | |
Gao (2019) [43] | China | RCT | Cerebral palsy, 52 (23/29) | C_rehb/Scalp acu + exercise | C_rehb | GMFM-88, ADL |
Rate of change before and after tx GMFM-88: Tx 16.84%, ctrl 12.98% (p < 0.05) ADL: Tx 26.55%, ctrl 25.59%, (p < 0.05) |
Not specified | |
Shin (2013) [39] | Korea | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 58 (29/29) | MSAT | Intramuscular injection of NSAIDS (diclofenac) | NRS for LBP, ODI, |
Diff between the two groups 30 min after tx NRS for LBP: 3.12 (2.26, 3.98), p < 0.0001 NRS for RP: 0.97 (0.22, 1.71), p = 0.0137 ODI: 32.95 (26.88, 39.03), p < 0.0001 |
Not specified | |
Xu (2018) [34] | China | RCT | Shoulder pain, 60 (30/30) | Acu + exercise | Acu | VAS, Melle, ADL |
Outcomes after tx VAS: Tx 2.30 ± 1.12, ctrl 4.53 ± 1.36 (p < 0.05) Melle: Tx 3.50 ± 1.91, ctrl 8.40 ± 2.47 (p < 0.05) ADL: Tx 12.17 ± 3.24, ctrl 21.50 ± 1.74 (p < 0.05) |
Not specified | |
2 | Liu (2017) [47] | China | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 46 (26/20) | Acu/acu + movement | Oral adm of loxoprofen sodium | ROM, VAS, PPI |
Compared to the ctrl group, the tx group showed significantly improved lumbar ROM and VAS after tx (values not specified) Recovery rate: Tx 6 (30%), ctrl 14 (53.8%) |
Not specified |
Lin (2016) [40] | China | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 60 (15/15/15/15) | Acu-movement therapy | 1. Sham acu-movement 2. CAT 3. PT | VAS, RMQ |
Outcomes 24 h after tx VAS: Tx 15 ± 3, ctrl 32 ± 6, 25 ± 4, 31 ± 8, p < 0.05 RMQ: Tx 4.2 ± 1.0, ctrl 7.8 ± 1.4, 6.6 ± 1.6, 7.2 ± 2.2, p < 0.05 |
AM (n = 1) Sx: dizziness (n = 1) |
|
Zhang (2022) [46] | China | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 160 (40/40/40/40) | Dynamic qi acu |
A: Dq-a (10 min) B: Dq-a (20 min) C: Dq-a (30 min) Med: celecoxib |
NRS, ROM, ODI |
Diff before and after tx (A, B, C, and medication) NRS: 3 (2), 3 (2), 3 (2), 2 (2) ROM: 1 (1), 1.5 (1), 1 (1.75), 0 (1) ODI: 11.11 (4.44), 16.67 (7.22), 16.67 (6.67), 7.78 (3.38) Effective rate: 94.4%, 94.7%, 97.2%, 79.4% |
A (n = 0) B (n = 1, hematoma) C (n = 1, hematoma) Medication (n = 2, nausea, anorexia) |
|
Hong (2016) [33] | China | Case series | Tennis elbow, 160 | Exercise-acu | None | - |
Recovery: 85, significant effective: 49 Invalid: 26, effective rate: 83.7% |
Not specified | |
Luo (2010) [44] | China | Pros, Obs | Neck pain, 122 (57/65) | Acu + movement therapy | Acupuncture | Effective rate: Tx 98.24%, ctrl 96.9%, p > 0.05 | Not specified | ||
Qu (2019) [38] | China | Pros, Obs | Knee pain, 51 (17/17/17) | C-rehb/Exercise acu | 1. C_rehb/osteopathy 2. C_rehb | WOMAC, ROM |
WOMAC after tx TX 47.88 ± 5.94, ctrl 45.11 ± 6.16, 54.19 ± 4.65, p = 0.000 Pain score of the WOMAC Tx 8.90 ± 2.19, ctrl 11.98 ± 2.66, 10.66 ± 2.75, p = 0.004 |
Not specified | |
Luo (2017) [37] | China | RCT | Knee pain, 71 (36/35) | C_rehb/Shu-acu | C_rehb | JOA, VAS |
Outcome after tx JOA: Tx 82.92 ± 7.48, ctrl 68.93 ± 8.85, p < 0.05 VAS: Tx 0.87 ± 0.80, ctrl 2.61 ± 1.19, p < 0.05 Effective rate: Tx 91.7%, ctrl 80.0%, p < 0.05 |
Not specified | |
Fu (2022) [41] | China | Retro | LBP or radiating pain, 71 (36/35) | Balanced acu/manipulation. | Acu | VAS, RMDQ, ROM, JOA | Compared to the ctrl group, the tx group showed significantly improved VAS score, RMDQ, JOA score, and lumbar ROM (values not specified) | Not specified | |
Xie (2012) [35] | China | Case series | Tennis elbow, 39 | Exercise acu | None |
Recovery: 29, effect: 9 Invalid: 1, effective rate: 97.4% |
Not specified | ||
Sun (2014) [45] | China | Case series | LBP or radiating pain, 26 | Acu + movement therapy | None | Recovery: 14, 53.8%, significant effect: 10, 38.5%, Effect: 2, 7.7%, invalid: 0, 0% | Not specified | ||
Zhang (2021) [42] | China | RCT | Post-stroke, 154 | C_rehb/Scalp acu + LLIFT | C_rehb/LLIFT | Brunnstrom stage, MAS, 6MW test result, BBS, mBI, plantar pressure |
Brunnstrom stage: Proportions of stages 5 and 6 after tx Tx 30%, ctrl: 15% 6MWT result: Tx 184.92 ± 27.24, ctrl 144.51 ± 30.16 BBS: Tx 45.44 ± 4.09, ctrl 39.53 ± 7.36 MBI: Tx 52.28 ± 5.78, ctrl 36.97 ± 6.49 |
Not specified |
Acu = acupuncture; ADL = activities of daily living; BBS = Berg balance scale; BI = Barthel index; CAT = conventional acupuncture treatment; CMS = Constant-Murley score; Ctrl = control; C_rehb = conventional rehabilitation; Diff = difference; Dq-a = dynamic qi acupuncture; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol-5 dimensions 5 level; FMA = Fugl-Meyer Assessment; GMFM-88 = Gross Motor Function Measure-88; IKM = Integrative Korean Medicine; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedics Association; KT = kinesiotherapy; LBP = low back pain; LLIFT = lower-limb intelligent feedback training; MAS = Modified Ashworth Scale; mBI = modified Barthel Index; mCAT = minimize conventional acupuncture treatment; mMSAT = minimize motion style acupuncture treatment; MSAT = motion style acupuncture treatment; NDI = neck disability index; NRS = numeric rating scale; NSAIDS = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Obs = observational; ODI = Oswestry disability index; PGIC = patient’s global impression of change; PPI = present pain intensity; Pros = prospective; PT = physical therapy; RCT = randomized controlled trial; Retro = retrospective; RMDQ = Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; RMQ = Roland Morris Questionnaire; ROM = range of motion; RP = radiating pain; SF-36 = Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire; Sx = symptoms; TMD = temporomandibular disorder; Tx = treatment; VAS = visual analog scale; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index; 6MW = 6-minute walk test.
Type | 1st author (y) [ref] | Type of intervention | Acupuncture points | Movements (type of movement, body part) | Duration of the treatment sessions | Workload | Risk of procedure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Noh (2021) [50] | IKM/MSAT | Affected side, local, BL54, GB30, BL23, BL24,245,26,31,32 | Passive/active, hip joint | 10–20 min of MSAT was administered during hospitalization | High | Moderate |
Kim (2020) [24] | IKM/MSAT | Both sides, local, both upper trapezius | Active, cervical joint | 3 times (Days 2, 3 and 4 of hospitalization). 10 min | High | Moderate | |
Wang (2020) [49] | C_rehb/Acu + KT | Affected side, local, penetrating LI4, SI3, penetrating PC06, TE5 | Passive/active, wrist, metacarpophalangeal, interphalangeal joints | Once/d ×6 d/wk ×2 wk/course ×2 courses 30 min per session | High | Moderate | |
Wang (2015) [30] | Floating acu + jaw movement | Opposite/affected, distal/local, the opposite side of LI4 + affected area (points of pain during jaw movement for opening the mouth) | Active, temporomandibular joint | Once/d ×10 d/course ×2 courses, 30-min needle retention | Moderate | Moderate | |
Shi (2015) [31] | Exercise acu | Both/affected side, distal/local, scalp acu + lower limb of the affected side | Active, hip joint, knee joint, ankle joint | Once/d ×2 wk, 30 min of needle retention after exercise | Moderate | Moderate | |
2 | Shi (2018) [32] | Acu/MSAT | Opposite side, distal ST38 | Active, shoulder joint | Twice/wk ×6 wk, 20 min | Moderate | Low |
Lyu (2022) [36] | Acu/MSAT | Affected side, distal SI3 | Active, cervical joint | Twice/wk ×5 wk ×2 courses, 20-min needle retention followed by 5-min of MSAT | Moderate | Low | |
Park (2022) [27] | IKM/MSAT (H-MSAT or T-MSAT) | Both sides, distal GV16, LR2, LI11 | Active/passive, walking, physician-assisted (H-MSAT), device-assisted (T-MSAT). A patient is asked to walk with the assistance of the physicians on both sides. Then, the medical staff gradually stops supporting the patient. For T-MSAT, traction is used to help patients walk instead of physician assistants. |
H-MSAT: 2.75 ± 2.74 (n = 16) T-MSAT: 8.50 ± 9.17 (n = 16) 10–20 min per session |
High | Moderate | |
Gao (2019) [43] | C_rehb/Scalp acu + exercise | Both sides, scalp acu (motor area, balance zone, foot motor sensory area, sensory area, language area) | Active/passive, limb exercise, anti-gravity movement of the affected limb, horizontal movement, flexion movement of the joint | Once/d ×5 d/wk ×3 mo. 1 h | High | Low | |
Shin (2013) [39] | MSAT | Both sides, distal GV16, LR2, LI11 | Active/passive, walking | Once, 20 min | High | Moderate | |
Xu (2018) [34] | Acu + exercise | Opposite side, distal ST38, BL57 | Active, shoulder joint | Five times, every 2 d + 2 sets 5-min exercise during 20-min needle retention | Moderate | Low | |
Liu (2017) [47] | Acu/Acu + movement | Both sides, distal/local Yaotong (above Yintang, EX-HN3) + local Ashi-points (lumbar) | Active, lumbar joint, Ashi-points acu after acu (Yaotong) + movement therapy | Three times/wk ×1 wk 20 min + extra | Moderate | Low | |
Lin (2016) [40] | Acu + movement therapy | Both sides, distal Yintang (EX-HN3) | Active, lumbar joints | Once, 20 min | Moderate | Low | |
2 | Zhang (2022) [46] | Dynamic qi acu | Both sides, distal Yaotong + left LI3 | Active, lumbar joints | 5 d | Moderate | Low |
Hong (2016) [33] | Exercise acu | Opposite side, distal Jutong (near ST35 and EX-LE5) | Active, elbow joints | Once every 2 d ×5 times ×3 courses, 30–45 min, 6 mo follow-up | Moderate | Low | |
Luo (2010) [44] | Acu + movement therapy | Side not specified, distal LR5 | Active, cervical joints | Daily for 10 d, 30 min | Moderate | Low | |
Qu (2019) [38] | C-rehb/Exercise acu | Affected side, distal LI4, PE6, LI11 | Active/passive, knee joints | Once daily, 4 wk, 20 min. | High | Low | |
Luo (2017) [37] | C_rehb/Shu-acu | Affected side, distal BL66, BL65, ST44, ST43, ST41, GB41, SP2, SP3, LR2, LR3 | Active, quadriceps muscle training | Once daily, 30-min needle retention, treatment for 6 d in a row, followed by 1 d of a break and then by 8 wk of treatment | Moderate | Moderate | |
Fu (2022) [41] | Balanced acu/Manipulation | Both sides, distal Yaotong | Active, lower extremity exercises such as squats and sit to stand | Daily, 5 d (No explicit mention of duration) | Moderate | Low | |
Xie (2012) [35] | Exercise acu | Opposite side, distal GB34 | Active, elbow joint | Once/d 10 d ×2 courses 30–45 min | Moderate | Low | |
Sun (2014) [45] | Acu + movement therapy | Side not specified, distal GV26 | Active, antagonistic movement (instructing the sacrum to hold motion that causes pain) | Once/d ×6 d/wk ×2 wk 30 min | Moderate | Low | |
Zhang (2021) [42] | C_rehb/Scalp acu + LLIFT | Both sides, distal Scalp acu | Active, lower extremity exercise | Once/d ×6 d/wk ×8 wk 40 min | Moderate | Low |
Type | 1st author (y) [ref] | Country of origin | Study design | Participants’ condition, number of participants (intervention/control) | Type of intervention | Comparator | Outcome | Main results | Adverse events |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Noh (2021) [ |
Korea | Pros, Obs | LBP or radiating pain, 40 (20/20) | IKM/MSAT | IKM | NRS, ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L | Diff between two groups after tx NRS for LBP: −1.2 (−2.22, −0.19), p < 0.05 NRS for RP: −0.97 (−1.89, −0.06) p < 0.05 |
Tx (n = 4), ctrl (n = 8) Severity: mild Sx: gi sx (heartburn, abdominal discomfort) |
Kim (2020) [ |
Korea | RCT | Neck pain, 100 (50/50) | IKM/MSAT | IKM | NRS, VAS, NDI, ROM, EQ-5D-5L, PGIC | Diff between two groups after tx NRS: −1.05 (−1.57, −0.53), p < 0.05 ROM (Flexion): 5.55 (2.80, 8.31), p < 0.05 ROM (Extension): 6.60 (2.97, 10.23), p < 0.05 |
Tx (n = 13), ctrl (n = 7) Severity: mild except 1 Sx: diarrhea (n = 12), nausea or heartburn (n = 3), itching and rash (n = 4), dizziness (n = 1). | |
Wang (2020) [ |
China | RCT | Post-stoke, 105 (35/35/35) | C_rehb/Acu + KT | C_rehb/1. Acu only 2. KT only | MAS, ROM FMA, BI | Diff before and after tx in the tx group MAS: 1.41 ± 0.49 (ctrl 0.82 ± 0.43, 0.74 ± 0.28) FMA: 9.91 ± 3.01 (ctrl 6.45 ± 1.91, 5.85 ± 1.79) ADL: 28.24 ± 5.59 (ctrl 19.70 ± 7.60, 19.85 ± 6.80) |
Not specified | |
Wang (2015) [ |
China | Case series | TMD, 15 | Floating acu + jaw movement | None | - | Recovery: 10, Significant effect: 2 Effect: 2, Invalid: 1 |
Not specified | |
Shi (2015) [ |
China | Case series | Post-stoke, 30 | Exercise acu | None | - | Recovery: 5, Significant effect: 9 Effect: 12, Invalid: 4, Effective rate: 86.7% |
Not specified | |
2 | Shi (2018) [ |
China | RCT | Shoulder pain, 164 (41/41/41/41) | Acu/MSAT | 1. MSAT + mCAT 2. mMSAT + CAT 3. mMSAT + mCAT | VAS, CMS, SF-36, Treatment Credibility Scale | VAS at the 18-wk follow-up: MSAT 25.3 (24.1)/mMSAT 35.0 (25.0), p = 0.013 CAT 29.6 (25.2)/mCAT 30.7 (24.7), p = 0.78 CMS at the 18-wk follow-up: MSAT 79.9 (15.5)/mMSAT 73.3 (16.7), p = 0.010 CAT 75.3 (17.5)/mCAT 78.0 (15.1), p = 0.29 |
Tx (n = 6), ctrl (n = 6) Sx: small hematoma (n = 6), discomfort at needle insertion (n = 4), needling pain (n = 2) |
Lyu (2022) [ |
China | RCT | Neck pain, 76 (39/39) | Acu/MSAT | Acu | SF-36, pain pressure threshold | MSAT can be effective when the physical function score is 41.7–68.7 in the tx group, and CAT can be effective when the general health score is 56.09–66.09 in the ctrl group | Not specified | |
Park (2022) [ |
Korea | Retro | LBP or radiating pain, 152 (28/124) | IKM/MSAT (H-MSAT or T-MSAT) | IKM | NRS for LBP NRS for RP, ODI, EQ-5D-5L | Outcome changes in the MSAT group after tx NRS for LBP: 5.71 ± 1.58 → 2.57 (1.96–3.19) NRS for RP: 6.14 ± 1.35 → 2.72 (2.02–3.42) ODI: 49.69 ± 18.16 → 27.46 (22.26–32.66) EQ-5D: 0.54 ± 0.20 → 0.75 (0.71–0.80) |
Not specified | |
Gao (2019) [ |
China | RCT | Cerebral palsy, 52 (23/29) | C_rehb/Scalp acu + exercise | C_rehb | GMFM-88, ADL | Rate of change before and after tx GMFM-88: Tx 16.84%, ctrl 12.98% (p < 0.05) ADL: Tx 26.55%, ctrl 25.59%, (p < 0.05) |
Not specified | |
Shin (2013) [ |
Korea | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 58 (29/29) | MSAT | Intramuscular injection of NSAIDS (diclofenac) | NRS for LBP, ODI, | Diff between the two groups 30 min after tx NRS for LBP: 3.12 (2.26, 3.98), p < 0.0001 NRS for RP: 0.97 (0.22, 1.71), p = 0.0137 ODI: 32.95 (26.88, 39.03), p < 0.0001 |
Not specified | |
Xu (2018) [ |
China | RCT | Shoulder pain, 60 (30/30) | Acu + exercise | Acu | VAS, Melle, ADL | Outcomes after tx VAS: Tx 2.30 ± 1.12, ctrl 4.53 ± 1.36 (p < 0.05) Melle: Tx 3.50 ± 1.91, ctrl 8.40 ± 2.47 (p < 0.05) ADL: Tx 12.17 ± 3.24, ctrl 21.50 ± 1.74 (p < 0.05) |
Not specified | |
2 | Liu (2017) [ |
China | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 46 (26/20) | Acu/acu + movement | Oral adm of loxoprofen sodium | ROM, VAS, PPI | Compared to the ctrl group, the tx group showed significantly improved lumbar ROM and VAS after tx (values not specified) Recovery rate: Tx 6 (30%), ctrl 14 (53.8%) |
Not specified |
Lin (2016) [ |
China | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 60 (15/15/15/15) | Acu-movement therapy | 1. Sham acu-movement 2. CAT 3. PT | VAS, RMQ | Outcomes 24 h after tx VAS: Tx 15 ± 3, ctrl 32 ± 6, 25 ± 4, 31 ± 8, p < 0.05 RMQ: Tx 4.2 ± 1.0, ctrl 7.8 ± 1.4, 6.6 ± 1.6, 7.2 ± 2.2, p < 0.05 |
AM (n = 1) Sx: dizziness (n = 1) | |
Zhang (2022) [ |
China | RCT | LBP or radiating pain, 160 (40/40/40/40) | Dynamic qi acu | A: Dq-a (10 min) B: Dq-a (20 min) C: Dq-a (30 min) Med: celecoxib |
NRS, ROM, ODI | Diff before and after tx (A, B, C, and medication) NRS: 3 (2), 3 (2), 3 (2), 2 (2) ROM: 1 (1), 1.5 (1), 1 (1.75), 0 (1) ODI: 11.11 (4.44), 16.67 (7.22), 16.67 (6.67), 7.78 (3.38) Effective rate: 94.4%, 94.7%, 97.2%, 79.4% |
A (n = 0) B (n = 1, hematoma) C (n = 1, hematoma) Medication (n = 2, nausea, anorexia) | |
Hong (2016) [ |
China | Case series | Tennis elbow, 160 | Exercise-acu | None | - | Recovery: 85, significant effective: 49 Invalid: 26, effective rate: 83.7% |
Not specified | |
Luo (2010) [ |
China | Pros, Obs | Neck pain, 122 (57/65) | Acu + movement therapy | Acupuncture | Effective rate: Tx 98.24%, ctrl 96.9%, p > 0.05 | Not specified | ||
Qu (2019) [ |
China | Pros, Obs | Knee pain, 51 (17/17/17) | C-rehb/Exercise acu | 1. C_rehb/osteopathy 2. C_rehb | WOMAC, ROM | WOMAC after tx TX 47.88 ± 5.94, ctrl 45.11 ± 6.16, 54.19 ± 4.65, p = 0.000 Pain score of the WOMAC Tx 8.90 ± 2.19, ctrl 11.98 ± 2.66, 10.66 ± 2.75, p = 0.004 |
Not specified | |
Luo (2017) [ |
China | RCT | Knee pain, 71 (36/35) | C_rehb/Shu-acu | C_rehb | JOA, VAS | Outcome after tx JOA: Tx 82.92 ± 7.48, ctrl 68.93 ± 8.85, p < 0.05 VAS: Tx 0.87 ± 0.80, ctrl 2.61 ± 1.19, p < 0.05 Effective rate: Tx 91.7%, ctrl 80.0%, p < 0.05 |
Not specified | |
Fu (2022) [ |
China | Retro | LBP or radiating pain, 71 (36/35) | Balanced acu/manipulation. | Acu | VAS, RMDQ, ROM, JOA | Compared to the ctrl group, the tx group showed significantly improved VAS score, RMDQ, JOA score, and lumbar ROM (values not specified) | Not specified | |
Xie (2012) [ |
China | Case series | Tennis elbow, 39 | Exercise acu | None | Recovery: 29, effect: 9 Invalid: 1, effective rate: 97.4% |
Not specified | ||
Sun (2014) [ |
China | Case series | LBP or radiating pain, 26 | Acu + movement therapy | None | Recovery: 14, 53.8%, significant effect: 10, 38.5%, Effect: 2, 7.7%, invalid: 0, 0% | Not specified | ||
Zhang (2021) [ |
China | RCT | Post-stroke, 154 | C_rehb/Scalp acu + LLIFT | C_rehb/LLIFT | Brunnstrom stage, MAS, 6MW test result, BBS, mBI, plantar pressure | Brunnstrom stage: Proportions of stages 5 and 6 after tx Tx 30%, ctrl: 15% 6MWT result: Tx 184.92 ± 27.24, ctrl 144.51 ± 30.16 BBS: Tx 45.44 ± 4.09, ctrl 39.53 ± 7.36 MBI: Tx 52.28 ± 5.78, ctrl 36.97 ± 6.49 |
Not specified |
Type | 1st author (y) [ref] | Type of intervention | Acupuncture points | Movements (type of movement, body part) | Duration of the treatment sessions | Workload | Risk of procedure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Noh (2021) [ |
IKM/MSAT | Affected side, local, BL54, GB30, BL23, BL24,245,26,31,32 | Passive/active, hip joint | 10–20 min of MSAT was administered during hospitalization | High | Moderate |
Kim (2020) [ |
IKM/MSAT | Both sides, local, both upper trapezius | Active, cervical joint | 3 times (Days 2, 3 and 4 of hospitalization). 10 min | High | Moderate | |
Wang (2020) [ |
C_rehb/Acu + KT | Affected side, local, penetrating LI4, SI3, penetrating PC06, TE5 | Passive/active, wrist, metacarpophalangeal, interphalangeal joints | Once/d ×6 d/wk ×2 wk/course ×2 courses 30 min per session | High | Moderate | |
Wang (2015) [ |
Floating acu + jaw movement | Opposite/affected, distal/local, the opposite side of LI4 + affected area (points of pain during jaw movement for opening the mouth) | Active, temporomandibular joint | Once/d ×10 d/course ×2 courses, 30-min needle retention | Moderate | Moderate | |
Shi (2015) [ |
Exercise acu | Both/affected side, distal/local, scalp acu + lower limb of the affected side | Active, hip joint, knee joint, ankle joint | Once/d ×2 wk, 30 min of needle retention after exercise | Moderate | Moderate | |
2 | Shi (2018) [ |
Acu/MSAT | Opposite side, distal ST38 | Active, shoulder joint | Twice/wk ×6 wk, 20 min | Moderate | Low |
Lyu (2022) [ |
Acu/MSAT | Affected side, distal SI3 | Active, cervical joint | Twice/wk ×5 wk ×2 courses, 20-min needle retention followed by 5-min of MSAT | Moderate | Low | |
Park (2022) [ |
IKM/MSAT (H-MSAT or T-MSAT) | Both sides, distal GV16, LR2, LI11 | Active/passive, walking, physician-assisted (H-MSAT), device-assisted (T-MSAT). A patient is asked to walk with the assistance of the physicians on both sides. Then, the medical staff gradually stops supporting the patient. For T-MSAT, traction is used to help patients walk instead of physician assistants. | H-MSAT: 2.75 ± 2.74 (n = 16) T-MSAT: 8.50 ± 9.17 (n = 16) 10–20 min per session |
High | Moderate | |
Gao (2019) [ |
C_rehb/Scalp acu + exercise | Both sides, scalp acu (motor area, balance zone, foot motor sensory area, sensory area, language area) | Active/passive, limb exercise, anti-gravity movement of the affected limb, horizontal movement, flexion movement of the joint | Once/d ×5 d/wk ×3 mo. 1 h | High | Low | |
Shin (2013) [ |
MSAT | Both sides, distal GV16, LR2, LI11 | Active/passive, walking | Once, 20 min | High | Moderate | |
Xu (2018) [ |
Acu + exercise | Opposite side, distal ST38, BL57 | Active, shoulder joint | Five times, every 2 d + 2 sets 5-min exercise during 20-min needle retention | Moderate | Low | |
Liu (2017) [ |
Acu/Acu + movement | Both sides, distal/local Yaotong (above Yintang, EX-HN3) + local Ashi-points (lumbar) | Active, lumbar joint, Ashi-points acu after acu (Yaotong) + movement therapy | Three times/wk ×1 wk 20 min + extra | Moderate | Low | |
Lin (2016) [ |
Acu + movement therapy | Both sides, distal Yintang (EX-HN3) | Active, lumbar joints | Once, 20 min | Moderate | Low | |
2 | Zhang (2022) [ |
Dynamic qi acu | Both sides, distal Yaotong + left LI3 | Active, lumbar joints | 5 d | Moderate | Low |
Hong (2016) [ |
Exercise acu | Opposite side, distal Jutong (near ST35 and EX-LE5) | Active, elbow joints | Once every 2 d ×5 times ×3 courses, 30–45 min, 6 mo follow-up | Moderate | Low | |
Luo (2010) [ |
Acu + movement therapy | Side not specified, distal LR5 | Active, cervical joints | Daily for 10 d, 30 min | Moderate | Low | |
Qu (2019) [ |
C-rehb/Exercise acu | Affected side, distal LI4, PE6, LI11 | Active/passive, knee joints | Once daily, 4 wk, 20 min. | High | Low | |
Luo (2017) [ |
C_rehb/Shu-acu | Affected side, distal BL66, BL65, ST44, ST43, ST41, GB41, SP2, SP3, LR2, LR3 | Active, quadriceps muscle training | Once daily, 30-min needle retention, treatment for 6 d in a row, followed by 1 d of a break and then by 8 wk of treatment | Moderate | Moderate | |
Fu (2022) [ |
Balanced acu/Manipulation | Both sides, distal Yaotong | Active, lower extremity exercises such as squats and sit to stand | Daily, 5 d (No explicit mention of duration) | Moderate | Low | |
Xie (2012) [ |
Exercise acu | Opposite side, distal GB34 | Active, elbow joint | Once/d 10 d ×2 courses 30–45 min | Moderate | Low | |
Sun (2014) [ |
Acu + movement therapy | Side not specified, distal GV26 | Active, antagonistic movement (instructing the sacrum to hold motion that causes pain) | Once/d ×6 d/wk ×2 wk 30 min | Moderate | Low | |
Zhang (2021) [ |
C_rehb/Scalp acu + LLIFT | Both sides, distal Scalp acu | Active, lower extremity exercise | Once/d ×6 d/wk ×8 wk 40 min | Moderate | Low |
Acu = acupuncture; ADL = activities of daily living; BBS = Berg balance scale; BI = Barthel index; CAT = conventional acupuncture treatment; CMS = Constant-Murley score; Ctrl = control; C_rehb = conventional rehabilitation; Diff = difference; Dq-a = dynamic qi acupuncture; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol-5 dimensions 5 level; FMA = Fugl-Meyer Assessment; GMFM-88 = Gross Motor Function Measure-88; IKM = Integrative Korean Medicine; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedics Association; KT = kinesiotherapy; LBP = low back pain; LLIFT = lower-limb intelligent feedback training; MAS = Modified Ashworth Scale; mBI = modified Barthel Index; mCAT = minimize conventional acupuncture treatment; mMSAT = minimize motion style acupuncture treatment; MSAT = motion style acupuncture treatment; NDI = neck disability index; NRS = numeric rating scale; NSAIDS = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Obs = observational; ODI = Oswestry disability index; PGIC = patient’s global impression of change; PPI = present pain intensity; Pros = prospective; PT = physical therapy; RCT = randomized controlled trial; Retro = retrospective; RMDQ = Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; RMQ = Roland Morris Questionnaire; ROM = range of motion; RP = radiating pain; SF-36 = Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire; Sx = symptoms; TMD = temporomandibular disorder; Tx = treatment; VAS = visual analog scale; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index; 6MW = 6-minute walk test.
Acu = acupuncture; CAT = conventional acupuncture treatment; C_rehb = conventional rehabilitation; IKM = Integrative Korean Medicine; LLIFT = lower-limb intelligent feedback training. MSAT = motion style acupuncture treatment; PT = physical therapy; KT = kinesiotherapy.