, Jeong Su Park2,*
, Minji Kim1
, Gyumi Park1
, Yujin Lee1
, Hakyung Lee1
1College of Korean Medicine, Semyung University, Jecheon, Republic of Korea
2Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Semyung University, Jecheon, Republic of Korea
©2025 Jaseng Medical Foundation
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: KWP. Methodology: KWP, JSP, MJK, GMP, YJL, and HKL. Formal investigation: KWP, MJK, GMP, YJL, and HKL. Writing-original draft: KWP. Writing-review and editing: KWP, JSP, MJK, GMP, YJL, and HKL.
Conflict of Interest
The authors of this article have no conflict of interest to declare.
Author Use of AI Tools Statement
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT for locating and fixing grammatical errors and typos, and for clarifying sentences.
Funding
This article was supported by a grant from Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine.
Ethical Statement
Not applicable.
| Group | Clinical study [reference] | Country | Study design | Type of cancer | Group & n | Therapeutic methods | Outcome measurement | Outcome | Adverse effects | Satisfaction of patients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A* | Molassiotis et al [25] | United Kingdom | Randomized pragmatic controlled trial | Breast |
UC + AT: 227 UC: 75 |
AT on ST36, SP6, LI4, GB34, SP9 | MFI, HADS, FACT-G, FACT-B |
Acupuncture effect: GF (−3.11), GV (−2.49), PF (−2.36), RA (−2.29), RM (−2.02), MF (−1.94), Anxiety (−1.83), Depression (−2.13), PWB (3.30), SFWB (1.05), EWB (1.93), FWB (3.57) |
Not reported | Not reported |
| A* | Frisk et al [26] | Sweden | Randomized controlled trial | Breast |
EA: 27 HT: 18 |
EA | Median number of hot flushes and degree of distress by flushes/24 h, KI | Numbers of hot flushes/24 h (BL: 9.6, 3M: 4.3, 12M: 4.9, 24M: 2.1), Distress by hot flushes (BL: 24.0, 3M: 12.0, 12M: 13.0, 24M: 8.0), KI score (BL: 23.0, 3M: 6.0, 12M: 6.0, 24M: 4.0) | Not reported | After 12 wk of acupuncture as the only treatment, 85% of women with symptoms reported satisfaction lasting up to 1 year, and 63% were still satisfied after 2y |
| B† | Wode et al [27] | Sweden | Randomized controlled trial | Pancreatic |
ME: 145 P: 145 |
ME | OS, HRQoL | OS: (ME: 7.8M, P: 8.3M), 9M HRQoL (ME: −6.8, P: −6.2) |
AE: ME 64/140 (46%), P 65/143 (45%) LSR: ME 93/140(66%), P 2/143 (1%) |
Not reported |
| B† | Elsässer-Beile et al [28] | Germany | Clinical trial | Superficial bladder | 30 | ME | RR |
Recurrence number Ta/G2: (ME: 3/14, BCG: 2/5) T1/G2: (ME: 5/10, BCG: 3/13) Total: ME, 8/24 (33%); BCG, 5/18 (28%) |
No local or systemic side effects | Not reported |
| B† | Freyer et al [29] | France | Open-label, uncontrolled pilot study | Advanced or metastatic solid cancers including breast (29%), kidney (16%) and ovarian (13%) | 31 | Ruta graveolens at 9c dilution | EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, HADS, WHO PS, Imagery with RECIST 1.1 criteria |
QOL: BL (42), Wk 8 (55.2), Wk 16 (55.6), EOS (49.6) OS: 6.7M, OS without disease progression: 1.9M, OS without degeneration of QoL: 2.2M |
Total AE: 257 28/31 (90%) Abdominal pain (10.9%), Fatigue (10.5%) and Musculoskeletal pain (10.5%) AEs were not directly related to Ruta graveolens 9c. |
5/30 (20%) prefer to continue Ruta graveolens 9c treatment after EOS, from 6 to 36 wk . |
| B† | Gastmeier et al [30] | Germany | Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study | Not reported |
11,883 Cohort 1: 9,419 Cohort 2: 7,085 |
Tetrahydrocannabinol | ST (length of therapy from start in SAPC to death) |
Cohort 1 (patients with survival time ≥7 d): ≤4.7 mg/d THC vs no THC: HR, 1.08; median ST, 35 d. > 4.7 mg/d THC vs no THC: HR, 0.68; median ST, 74 d Cohort 2 (patients with survival time 7–100 d): ≤4.7 mg/day THC vs no THC: HR, 1.04; median ST, 25 d. > 4.7 mg/day THC vs no THC: HR, 0.70; median ST, 40 d |
Not reported | Not reported |
* Acupuncture group.
† B Herbal medicine.
AE = adverse event; AT = acupuncture treatment; BCG = Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; BL = baseline; D = Day; EA = electro acupuncture; EOS = end of study; EWB = emotional well-being; FACT-B = functional assessment of cancer therapy–breast cancer; FACT-G = functional assessment of cancer therapy–general; FWB = functional well-being; GF = general fatigue; HADS = hospital anxiety and depression scale; HRQoL = health-related quality of life dimension global health/QoL(EORTC–QLQ–C30; HT = hormone therapy; KI = Kupperman’s index; LSR = local skin reaction; LVCF = last value carried forward; M = month; ME = mistletoe extract; MF = mental fatigue; MFI = multidimensional fatigue inventory; OS = overall survival; P = placebo; PF = physical fatigue; PWB = physical well-being; QoL = quality of life; RA = reduced activity; RM = reduced motivation; RR = recurrence rate; SFWB = social/family well-being; ST = survival time; UC = usual care; WK = week.
| Group | Clinical study [reference] | Country | Study design | Type of cancer | Group & n | Therapeutic methods | Outcome measurement | Outcome | Adverse effects | Satisfaction of patients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A |
Molassiotis et al [ |
United Kingdom | Randomized pragmatic controlled trial | Breast | UC + AT: 227 UC: 75 |
AT on ST36, SP6, LI4, GB34, SP9 | MFI, HADS, FACT-G, FACT-B | Acupuncture effect: GF (−3.11), GV (−2.49), PF (−2.36), RA (−2.29), RM (−2.02), MF (−1.94), Anxiety (−1.83), Depression (−2.13), PWB (3.30), SFWB (1.05), EWB (1.93), FWB (3.57) |
Not reported | Not reported |
| A |
Frisk et al [ |
Sweden | Randomized controlled trial | Breast | EA: 27 HT: 18 |
EA | Median number of hot flushes and degree of distress by flushes/24 h, KI | Numbers of hot flushes/24 h (BL: 9.6, 3M: 4.3, 12M: 4.9, 24M: 2.1), Distress by hot flushes (BL: 24.0, 3M: 12.0, 12M: 13.0, 24M: 8.0), KI score (BL: 23.0, 3M: 6.0, 12M: 6.0, 24M: 4.0) | Not reported | After 12 wk of acupuncture as the only treatment, 85% of women with symptoms reported satisfaction lasting up to 1 year, and 63% were still satisfied after 2y |
| B |
Wode et al [ |
Sweden | Randomized controlled trial | Pancreatic | ME: 145 P: 145 |
ME | OS, HRQoL | OS: (ME: 7.8M, P: 8.3M), 9M HRQoL (ME: −6.8, P: −6.2) | AE: ME 64/140 (46%), P 65/143 (45%) LSR: ME 93/140(66%), P 2/143 (1%) |
Not reported |
| B |
Elsässer-Beile et al [ |
Germany | Clinical trial | Superficial bladder | 30 | ME | RR | Recurrence number Ta/G2: (ME: 3/14, BCG: 2/5) T1/G2: (ME: 5/10, BCG: 3/13) Total: ME, 8/24 (33%); BCG, 5/18 (28%) |
No local or systemic side effects | Not reported |
| B |
Freyer et al [ |
France | Open-label, uncontrolled pilot study | Advanced or metastatic solid cancers including breast (29%), kidney (16%) and ovarian (13%) | 31 | Ruta graveolens at 9c dilution | EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, HADS, WHO PS, Imagery with RECIST 1.1 criteria | QOL: BL (42), Wk 8 (55.2), Wk 16 (55.6), EOS (49.6) OS: 6.7M, OS without disease progression: 1.9M, OS without degeneration of QoL: 2.2M |
Total AE: 257 28/31 (90%) Abdominal pain (10.9%), Fatigue (10.5%) and Musculoskeletal pain (10.5%) AEs were not directly related to Ruta graveolens 9c. |
5/30 (20%) prefer to continue Ruta graveolens 9c treatment after EOS, from 6 to 36 wk . |
| B |
Gastmeier et al [ |
Germany | Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study | Not reported | 11,883 Cohort 1: 9,419 Cohort 2: 7,085 |
Tetrahydrocannabinol | ST (length of therapy from start in SAPC to death) | Cohort 1 (patients with survival time ≥7 d): ≤4.7 mg/d THC vs no THC: HR, 1.08; median ST, 35 d. > 4.7 mg/d THC vs no THC: HR, 0.68; median ST, 74 d Cohort 2 (patients with survival time 7–100 d): ≤4.7 mg/day THC vs no THC: HR, 1.04; median ST, 25 d. > 4.7 mg/day THC vs no THC: HR, 0.70; median ST, 40 d |
Not reported | Not reported |
Acupuncture group. B Herbal medicine. AE = adverse event; AT = acupuncture treatment; BCG = Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; BL = baseline; D = Day; EA = electro acupuncture; EOS = end of study; EWB = emotional well-being; FACT-B = functional assessment of cancer therapy–breast cancer; FACT-G = functional assessment of cancer therapy–general; FWB = functional well-being; GF = general fatigue; HADS = hospital anxiety and depression scale; HRQoL = health-related quality of life dimension global health/QoL(EORTC–QLQ–C30; HT = hormone therapy; KI = Kupperman’s index; LSR = local skin reaction; LVCF = last value carried forward; M = month; ME = mistletoe extract; MF = mental fatigue; MFI = multidimensional fatigue inventory; OS = overall survival; P = placebo; PF = physical fatigue; PWB = physical well-being; QoL = quality of life; RA = reduced activity; RM = reduced motivation; RR = recurrence rate; SFWB = social/family well-being; ST = survival time; UC = usual care; WK = week.